0.03/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Jul 5 04:25:24 EDT 2024 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.34 This is a THF_ problem 0.10/0.34 Running vampire_ho --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.10/0.36 % (18744)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/17Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18743)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/385Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18745)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/74Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18746)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18747)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/915Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18741)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/36Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18742)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi) 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Instruction limit reached! 0.10/0.36 % (18746)------------------------------ 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Termination reason: Unknown 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Termination phase: Property scanning 0.10/0.36 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Memory used [KB]: 1023 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Time elapsed: 0.003 s 0.10/0.36 % (18746)Instructions burned: 4 (million) 0.10/0.36 % (18746)------------------------------ 0.10/0.36 % (18746)------------------------------ 0.10/0.36 % (18740)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/96Mi) 0.18/0.36 % (18747)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy 0.18/0.36 % (18747)------------------------------ 0.18/0.36 % (18747)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.18/0.36 % (18747)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy 0.18/0.36 0.18/0.36 0.18/0.36 % (18747)Memory used [KB]: 5628 0.18/0.36 % (18747)Time elapsed: 0.006 s 0.18/0.36 % (18747)Instructions burned: 9 (million) 0.18/0.36 % (18747)------------------------------ 0.18/0.36 % (18747)------------------------------ 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Instruction limit reached! 0.18/0.37 % (18744)------------------------------ 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Termination reason: Unknown 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Termination phase: Saturation 0.18/0.37 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Memory used [KB]: 5884 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Time elapsed: 0.012 s 0.18/0.37 % (18744)Instructions burned: 18 (million) 0.18/0.37 % (18744)------------------------------ 0.18/0.37 % (18744)------------------------------ 0.18/0.37 % (18741)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy 0.18/0.37 % (18741)------------------------------ 0.18/0.37 % (18741)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.18/0.37 % (18741)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy 0.18/0.37 0.18/0.37 0.18/0.37 % (18741)Memory used [KB]: 5756 0.18/0.37 % (18741)Time elapsed: 0.016 s 0.18/0.37 % (18741)Instructions burned: 25 (million) 0.18/0.37 % (18741)------------------------------ 0.18/0.37 % (18741)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18748)dis+21_1:8_apa=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:fsr=off:hud=0:ins=1:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=21:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/21Mi) 0.18/0.38 % (18749)lrs-3_1:1024_cbe=off:chr=on:tnu=1:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi) 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Instruction limit reached! 0.18/0.38 % (18742)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Termination reason: Unknown 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Termination phase: Saturation 0.18/0.38 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Memory used [KB]: 5756 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Time elapsed: 0.020 s 0.18/0.38 % (18742)Instructions burned: 34 (million) 0.18/0.38 % (18742)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18742)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Instruction limit reached! 0.18/0.38 % (18749)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Termination reason: Unknown 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Termination phase: Saturation 0.18/0.38 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Memory used [KB]: 5500 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Time elapsed: 0.005 s 0.18/0.38 % (18749)Instructions burned: 8 (million) 0.18/0.38 % (18749)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18749)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18740)First to succeed. 0.18/0.38 % (18750)dis+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:hud=1:nm=3:piset=or:prag=on:s2a=on:sp=const_max:i=1021:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1021Mi) 0.18/0.38 % (18740)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.18/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.18/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_1, type, agent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_3, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_4, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiooIiioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_5, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_7, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_8, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIIiioIIiioIoIioI: (($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_9, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_10, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_11, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_12, type, knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_29, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_30, type, member_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_35, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_36, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_37, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_38, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_39, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_40, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_50, type, sK0: $i > $i). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_51, type, sK1: $i > $i). 0.18/0.38 thf(func_def_53, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)). 0.18/0.38 thf(f317,plain,( 0.18/0.38 $false), 0.18/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f316])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f316,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ($false = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f213,f313])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f313,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $false)), 0.18/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f307])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f307,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $false) | ($true != $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f232,f256])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f256,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | ($false = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1))) )), 0.18/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f255,f232])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f255,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )), 0.18/0.38 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f254])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f254,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)) )), 0.18/0.38 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f253])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f253,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))) @ X1) = $true)) )), 0.18/0.38 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f247])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f247,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f246])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f246,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))))), 0.18/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f245])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f245,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | ($true != $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f223,f203])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f203,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f127,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f126])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f126,plain,( 0.18/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ! [X0] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))), 0.18/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f40])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f40,axiom,( 0.18/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ! [X7] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X7) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X7)))), 0.18/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_017)). 0.18/0.38 thf(f223,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f150,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f137])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f137,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f136])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f136,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), 0.18/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f8])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f8,negated_conjecture,( 0.18/0.38 ~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), 0.18/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f7])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f7,conjecture,( 0.18/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), 0.18/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)). 0.18/0.38 thf(f232,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f231])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f231,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ($true != $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f223,f229])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f229,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ($true = (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))), 0.18/0.38 inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f219])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f219,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f147])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f147,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f146])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f146,plain,( 0.18/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i))), 0.18/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f9])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f9,axiom,( 0.18/0.38 (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i))), 0.18/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_015)). 0.18/0.38 thf(f213,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f149])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f149,plain,( 0.18/0.38 ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)), 0.18/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f148])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f148,plain,( 0.18/0.38 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)), 0.18/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f42])). 0.18/0.38 thf(f42,axiom,( 0.18/0.38 (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)), 0.18/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_006)). 0.18/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.18/0.38 % (18740)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18740)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100) 0.18/0.38 % (18740)Termination reason: Refutation 0.18/0.38 0.18/0.38 % (18740)Memory used [KB]: 5756 0.18/0.38 % (18740)Time elapsed: 0.023 s 0.18/0.38 % (18740)Instructions burned: 29 (million) 0.18/0.38 % (18740)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18740)------------------------------ 0.18/0.38 % (18739)Success in time 0.037 s 0.18/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting 0.18/0.38 EOF